Vol. 20, No. 4,998 - The American Reporter - June 11, 2014




by Ed Tubbs
AR Correspondent
Palm Springs, Calif.
March 10, 2011
Ed Tubbs
GUESS WHO?

Back to home page

Printable version of this story

DUMMERSTON, Vt. -- There was an interesting post last week by Simon Johnson, the former chief economist for the International Monetary Fund, on The New York Times' "Economix" blog.

Johnson asked the question of whether there is a fiscal crisis in the United States. His answer is that while there are serious medium-term issues, by any standard of measure, our nation is not facing an immediate fiscal crisis.

The problem, in his view, is that the politicians and the media seem to think there is an immediate financial crisis, and they are driving policies on the state and national levels that are damaging to the nation's economic health, while ignoring the things that nearly collapsed the global economy.

"The most immediate problem is that our largest banks and closely related parts of the financial system blew themselves up in 2007-8," Johnson wrote. "The ensuing recession and associated loss of tax revenue will end up increasing our government debt, as a percentage of gross domestic product, by around 40 percent. Very little of this debt increase was due to the fiscal stimulus; mostly it was caused by lower tax revenue, because of the slump in output and employment."

And, since nothing was done by either political party about the "too big to fail" banks and the excessive risk-taking culture that caused the current recession, another financial disaster is inevitable.

Another elephant in the room that Johnson identifies is out-of-control health spending. "The issue is most definitely not about cutting the current level of such spending or immediately reducing the benefits in Medicare," he writes. "But in the projections, by 2030 or 2040, the growth of health care spending ruins us all - whether or not we get the government to pay for it."

Once again, neither party made a significant effort to address this issue during the health-care debate of 2009-10. President Obama's health care made a half-hearted attempt at cost-control, but Republicans are hell-bent on repealing the bill, and have no coherent plan beyond repeal.

The last major problem, as Johnson sees it, is a "completely antiquated" tax system.

"For the same level of tax revenue relative to GDP, we could greatly reduce the distortions (e.g., disincentives to work) just by modernizing," he writes. "The right and the left agree that we should tax consumption more and income less, but neither is willing to make any kind of meaningful move toward a value-added tax (VAT).

"The right seems afraid that this tax will be too effective and power an expansion of government. The left thinks a VAT is inevitably regressive (imposing more burden on poorer people), despite all the evidence that the impact of VAT depends on how it is designed - because you can choose what gets zero taxes (e.g., baby clothes) and high taxes (e.g., yachts)."

So, in a nutshell, neither party wants to talk openly about how reckless behavior by our biggest banks led to a economic disaster. Nor is anyone willing to explain why our health-care costs continue to rise. And, when it comes to taxes, no one wants to see real tax reform.

"Both sides of our political elite have contributed to the sense of fiscal crisis," Johnson concludes. "And as we continue down this path - dangerous big banks, out-of-control health care spending, significant tax cuts, small changes in nonmilitary discretionary spending and irresponsible rhetoric on both sides - we are well on our way to a real crisis."

Johnson didn't offer any remedies, but if we had political leaders with courage, intelligence and common sense, they would be considering these ideas:

  • Social Security is still financially sound for the next 30 years if nothing is done. But if the income cap was on the FICA deduction was raised to about $156,000 - which covers about 90 percent of American income - Social Security would be solvent indefinitely.
  • Immediately rescind the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans, and slowly phase out the rest of them over the next couple of years.
  • Raise the top tax bracket on the wealthiest Americans, say those with income over $2 million a year, to 50 percent.
  • Put in place a financial transaction tax. A 0.25 percent tax on every stock transaction and a 0.02 percent tax on options, futures and swaps could raise as much as $150 billion a year and rein in the speculators.
  • End corporate welfare, the subsides, giveaways and tax breaks that go to business interests that don't need them.
  • Cut the defense budget in half over the next five years. We already spend more on our military than every other nation in the world, combined, and it is not making our nation safer or more secure.
  • Combine or end duplicate programs within the federal government. A honest reorganization of government is long overdue.
  • Finally, solve the health-care crisis by opening up Medicare to every American who needs health insurance. "Medicare for All" is still the most effective strategy for delivering health care at low cost.

Do these things, and you would see real progress toward putting the nation on a sounder financial footing.

Unfortunately, no one in a position of power in Washington possesses courage, intelligence and common sense to do these things. And too few Americans are demanding these qualities from their leaders so that we have a stronger, healthier, more productive nation.

AR's Chief of Correspondents Randolph T. Holhut has been a journalist in New England for more than 30 years. He edited "The George Seldes Reader" (Barricade Books). He can be reached at randyholhut@yahoo.com.

Copyright 2014 Joe Shea The American Reporter. All Rights Reserved.

Site Meter