Vol. 20, No. 5,046W - The American Reporter - August 30, 2014




by Joyce Marcel
American Reporter Correspondent
Dummerston, Vt.
December 21, 2009
Momentum
WILD HORSES

Back to home page

Printable version of this story

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. -- As a writer, I don't like trite phrases, marketing jargon, or clichés. So I was pleased to see a piece by Frances Cole Jones on CNN.com talking about her 10 worst business sayings.

In my work as a marketer, I hear these phrases a lot, and I want to see these eliminated from business use completely. I love Jones' list, and want to do my best to make sure her choices are struck from daily usage. I'm glad she's taking this stance against appalling language. I'm definitely on her side on this, because she has managed to pick most of my pet peeves. Apparently the language "crisis" is becoming "urgent" to language mavens like Jones. At least it would be, if she didn't say "urgent" and "its frequent companion 'crisis'" need to be eliminated. I am asked a lot of questions about blogging and social media. People who want to start doing this always ask if they can "pick my brain," as if my knowledge is some intellectual booger that can be harvested with a probing finger. I don't mind it, usually only asking for lunch or a latte in return, but still, keep your finger in your nose and leave me alone. The problem is that I'm giving this advice for free, even though consultants charge $100 an hour for the same advice. I find that if someone pays for information, they make sure to use it. But if they get it free, they don't follow the recommendations. That's because they don't have any skin in the game, any "sweat equity." And now they really can't, since Jones wants to get rid of that phrase too. Real sweat equity is the labor homeowners put into their own house, rather than hiring someone else to do it. In business, sweat equity is when someone works for free, since the company can't afford to pay them. But when they do have money, the contractor will get sweat equity. Double-secret-promise you will! And after the sweat equity rip-off - I mean, offer - is made, the "ball is in your court" as to whether you want to accept it. Except Jones is taking her ball and going home. She says we use this phrase "to let others know you've reached your limit with regard to handling a situation." In other words, when I've done all I can, the ball is in your court and it's up to you to take the next step. I can't do anything until you return the ball. That's when I gather up all my options and "throw them against the wall (to) see what sticks." Although it refers to taking a bunch of ideas and seeing which ones are any good, I have actually used this technique in determining the doneness of pasta ever since college. Just take a noodle from the boiling water, and throw it against the wall. If it sticks, it's done. If it doesn't, your wife will be angry with you. It actually works pretty well, just so long as you remember to clean the noodles from behind the stove. Still, Jones, and my wife, won't let me use the phrase, or the technique, anymore. But "I, personally," still like the term, even if I can't go flinging spaghetti all over the kitchen. Except Jones, personally, hates "I, personally," so I have to get rid of that too. It's redundant. After all, if I'm talking about my opinion, it's already personal, so there's no reason to use it again. It's like the phrase "really unique," "quite unique," or "truly unique," all of which have been given the chop. Things are unique, or they're not. Unique means "one of a kind." Things can't be "really one of a kind." That's truly redundant. We just need to eliminate this kind of speech from our everyday usage. It's becoming tedious and clichéd. It's ruining our language. We used to be a fairly literate, well-spoken society, but we seem to be killing it slowly with these buzzwords. I'd like to think we could eliminate the problem altogether, but our "past history" tells me otherwise. And now Frances Cole Jones says we can't say "past history" either, because it's also redundant. But I don't see what's so hard about fixing our language. It's just a matter of taking the really annoying corporate buzzword jargon that people use to sound cool (it's not working, by the way), and eliminating it from daily use. I mean, it's not "rocket science... ." Uh oh.

Erik Deckers publishes his humor column and other humorous articles at his Laughing Stalk blog.

Copyright 2014 Joe Shea The American Reporter. All Rights Reserved.

Site Meter