by Walter M. Brasch
American Reporter Correspondent
March 7, 2002
AMERICA'S NEW FEAR: THE TRUTH
BLOOMSBURG, Pa. -- Between a diner and an empty store that once housed a shoe store, video store, and tanning salon, in a small strip mall in Bloomsburg, Pa., is Friends-in-Mind, an independent bookstore.
On the first floor are more than 10,000 books on some 1,200 running feet of shelves that create aisles only about three feet wide. On top of the shelves are stacks of 10, 15, or even 20more books. On the floor are hundreds more, stacked spine out three or four feet high.
There are books in metal racks, drawers, and on counters. It's hard to walk through the store without bumping into a pile in the 1,000-sq. ft. store. In the basement, held in reserve, are 2,000 more books.
"Sometimes I order four or five copies of a title, but often I only order one copy, but I want to have whatever my customers want," says owner Arline Johnson, who founded the store in 1976 after working almost two decades as a clinical psychologist and teacher.
Unlike the chain stores with magazine and newspaper racks, wide aisles, track lighting, and even a coffee shop, Friends-in-Mind has only books and some greeting cards.
Also unlike the chain stores with their large budgets for space andpromotion that can attract hundreds of customers a day, Johnson says "on a real good day" she sees maybe 25 or 30 people; often shesees fewer than a dozen.
In September 1984, she saw someone she didn't want to see. A week after the Naval Institute Press shipped three copies of Tom Clancy's cold war thriller, "The Hunt for Red October," the FBI showed up.
The FBI, which apparently got the information from the publisher, "wanted to know where the books were and who purchased them," says Johnson. She says she told the two men that she couldn't remember to whom she sold two of the copies, but acknowledged she sent one copy to her cousin, who had served aboard a nuclear submarine, "and had all kinds of clearances." Johnson says she wasn't pleased about the interrogation - "and my cousin certainly wasn't happy about anyone checking on what he was reading." The FBI never returned, but occasionally residents in this rural conservative community will complain about what's in the store. She's been challenged for selling books about Karl Marx, gay rights, and even dinosaurs. Johnson says she tells the "book police" that "it's important that people learn and read about everything, whether they believe it or not." She also stocks copies of the Constitution and the Federalist Papers. Left-wing. Right-wing. Business. Labor. Anti-establishment. Everything's available in her store.
"It's not the government's job to tell me or anyone what they can read," she says. But the government has decided that under the cloak of "national security" it can abridge the rights of the citizen. The base is the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
Under that Act's provisions, the government may conduct covert surveillance of individuals only after seeking an order from a special government-created secret court. However, that Court, in its first two decades, granted every one of the government's more than 12,000 requests. The most recent series of intrusions upon civil liberties began in 1998 when special prosecutor Ken Starr demanded that a bookstore release records of what Monica Lewinsky had purchased.
It was a sweeping allegation that had no reasonable basis of establishing any groundwork in Starr's attacks upon President Clinton. Since then, there have been several cases in which police, operating with warrants issued in state courts, have demanded a bookstore's records.
In state actions, individuals have the right to ask local and state courts to quash subpoenas for records. If denied, they may appeal all the way to state supreme courts. There is no such protection under FISA. Not only can't individuals and businesses be represented in that secret court, they're bound by a federalgag order prohibiting any disclosure that such an order was evenissued. There is no recourse. No appeal.
Then came the U.S.A Patriot Act, drafted by the Bush administration, and fine-tuned in secret by the House and Senateleadership following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The Patriot Act, which incorporates and significantly expands FISA to include American citizens, was overwhelmingly approved by the Congress, most of whom admit they read only a few paragraphs, if any atall, of the 342-page document. President Bush enthusiasticallysigned the bill, Oct. 26.
Among its almost innumerable provisions, the Act reduces judicial oversight of telephone and Internet surveillance and grants the FBI almost unlimited, and unchecked, access to business records without requiring it to show even minimal evidence of a crime.
The FBI doesn't even need to give the individual time to call an attorney. Failure to immediately comply could result in that person's immediate detainment. The federal government can now require libraries to divulge what books patrons check out, video stores to reveal what tapes customers bought or rented, even grocery and drug stores todisclose what paperbacks shoppers bought.
The effect of the U.S.A Patriot Act upon places that loan, rent, or sell books, videos, magazines, and music CDs is not tofind and incarcerate terrorists - there are far more ways toinvestigate threats to the nation than to check on a terrorist's reading and listening habits - but to put a sweeping chilling effect upon Constitutional freedoms. The Act butts against the protections of the First (free speech), Fourth (unreasonable searches), Fifth (right against self-incrimination), and Sixth (due process) amendments. If the Act is not modified, book publishers will take even fewer chances on publishing works that, like The Hunt for Red October "might" result in the government investigation; bookstore owners may not buy as many different titles; and the people, fearing that whatever they read might besubject to Big Brother's scrutiny, may not buy controversial books or check books out of the library.
Even worse, writers may not create the works that a free nation should read. How ironic it is that a President who says he wants everyone to read is the one who may be responsible for giving the people less choice in what they may read.
Chris Finan, president of the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, believes "we've seen some shift" in the hard-core attitudes of the government's position. He believes public opinion will eventually shift "from the panic after Sept. 11 to allow a reasonable debate of the dangers" created by the U.S.A Patriot Act. The Act has a *built-in sunset provision -- several sections will expire, unless Congress renews them, on Dec. 31, 2005. Judith Krug of the American Library Association isn't as optimistic as Finan.
"It's going to be used as long as they think they can get away with it," says Krug, one of the nation's leading experts in First Amendment rights and civil liberties.Krug says until the people "start challenging the Act in thefederal courts, we'll be lucky if we can 'sunset' out any of it."
In the meantime, Arline Johnson says she doesn't keep computer records, accept credits cards, or even have a store newsletter, all of which can compromise the Constitutional protections of her customers.
"I once lived and taught in Bulgaria," says Johnson, "and I don't like totalitarian regimes."
It makes no difference if it's a Balkan dictatorship or one created out of fear in a democracy. As Benjamin Franklin once argued, a nation that gives up freedom to gain security deserves neither.
Walt Brasch's latest book is "The Joyof Sax: America During the Bill Clinton Era."