Vol. 22, No. 5,514 - The American Reporter - September 7, 2016



by Norman Solomon
American Reporter Correspondent
Washington, D.C.
June 11, 2001
Media Beat: IN MEDIALAND, IT WAS TIME TO KILL

Back to home page

Printable version of this story

WASHINGTON -- Minutes after a federal judge ruled that the execution of Timothy McVeigh should proceed on June 11 as scheduled, CNN was airing live=

interviews with people who lost relatives in the Oklahoma City bombing. When an anchor asked one woman whether she planned to attend the closed-cir= cuit telecast of the execution, her reply was unequivocal: "I'll be there w= ith bells on."

Overall, major news outlets were more discreet as they looked forward to= the long-awaited execution. Yet media enthusiasm was transparent. And cabl= e news channels -- seeking a spike in ratings -- made the most of the oppor= tunity.

For CNN, which came into its own a decade ago as a national and global n= ews network during the Gulf War, the latest chance to lure a big audience c= ame courtesy of McVeigh, a former U.S. Army sergeant who was a bit player i= n that war. The media glory went to men named Schwarzkopf and Powell. More recently, infamy has gone to McVeigh.

One way or another, high-profile death has been very good for the media business. When the victims are foreigners on the wrong side of American fir= epower (for instance, in Baghdad or Belgrade), they serve as mere dots on P= entagon-produced videos of missile strikes, rapturously shown on this count= ry's TV networks. In diametric contrast, when outsized celebrities (Princes= s Di or JFK Jr.) go to untimely deaths, their humanity looms extra large --= the opposite of blips on screens.

When U.S. taxpayers have footed the bill for bombs taking lives overseas= -- for example, in Central America during the 1980s or in Iraq and Yugosla= via later on -- the victims and their mourning relatives have gotten scant empathetic news coverage in the United States. Consciously or otherwise, jo= urnalists are often quick to ask for whom the bell tolls, and then shrug.

In the case of the 168 people in Oklahoma City whose lives were cruelly destroyed, the mastermind did not become rich or attain a Cabinet post. He was executed.

America has been in the midst of macabre synergy between ratings-driven TV news outlets and grief-stricken survivors of the explosion at the Murrah= Federal Building. Perhaps each provided some of what the other needed, or at least craved. In any event, a huge media spectacle moved to its grim cli= max.

No staged episode of "reality TV" could replicate the scale and scop= e of the government's real-life murder of an unrepentant murderer.

Genera= lly, when death claims a loved one and changes our lives forever, we feel t= hat the world should take notice, that respects should be paid. We may reco= gnize, as philosopher Corliss Lamont put it, that the tragedy of death "is inherent in the great gift of life." And yet, at the same time, like Dylan Thomas, we may "Rage, rage against the dying of the light."

Such rage is especially acute when lives are cut short by intentional ac= tions such as the one that McVeigh took on a Spring day in 1995. It's under= standable that after six years of mourning and anguish, a relative would ju= mp at the chance to stand in front of media microphones -- and, in effect, in front of the world -- to rejoice aloud that the life of the "delusional and suicidal" McVeigh was about to be snuffed out.

Complete with horrific criminality and lethal vengeance, the drama on th= e nation's main stage was both a real-life calamity and a choreographed mor= ality play produced largely by news media. With official enthusiasm from ag= encies with names like "Justice Department," the taking of a human life was= rendered as affirmation of the sanctity of human life.

The equation can be understood as Orwellian; we revere life by inflictin= g death. "The Execution of Timothy McVeigh: The TV Show" featured a numbing= blitz of show-biz solemnity, complete with black suits worn by network anc= hors on execution day. But the coverage rarely questioned a key premise of capital punishment: Our society must kill in order to emphasize that killin= g is wrong.

For this grisly media show, there was no understudy available for the le= ad role. Strict procedures, spelled out in the government's Execution Proto= col, required that guards continuously monitor the condemned prisoner durin= g his final days and hours -- to make sure that he didn't try to harm himse= lf.

Norman Solomon's latest book is "The Habits of Highly Deceptive Me= dia." His syndicated column focuses on media and politics.

Copyright 2016 Joe Shea The American Reporter. All Rights Reserved.

Site Meter