Vol. 22, No. 5,514 - The American Reporter - September 7, 2016

by Norman Solomon
American Reporter Correspondent
Washington, D.C.
May 25, 2001

Back to home page

Printable version of this story

WASHINGTON -- Few media eyebrows went up when the World Bank recently ca= nceled a global meeting set for Barcelona in late June -- and shifted it to=

the Internet. Thousands of street demonstrators would have been in Spain's= big northeastern port city to confront the conference. Cyberspace promises= to be a much more serene location.

The World Bank is eager to portray its decision as magnanimous, sparing Barcelona the sort of upheaval that has struck Seattle, Prague, Quebec City= and other urban hosts of international economic summits.

"A conference on poverty reduction should take place in a peaceful atmo= sphere free from heckling, violence and intimidation," says a World Bank of= ficial, adding that "it is time to take a stand against this kind of threat= to free expression."

A senior adviser to the huge lending institution offered this explanatio= n: "We decided that you can't have a meeting of ideas behind a cordon of po= lice officers." Presumably, the meeting of ideas will flourish behind a cor= don of passwords, bytes and pixels.

If hackers can be kept at bay, the fe= w hundred participants in the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economi= cs will be able to conduct a lovely forum over the Internet. The video conf= erencing system is likely to be state-of-the-art, making possible a modern and bloodless way to avoid uninvited perspectives.

The World Bank's retre= at behind virtual walls may fulfill its goal of keeping the riffraff away, with online discourse going smoothly, but vital issues remain -- such as po= licies that undercut essential government services in poor countries, while= promoting privatization and user fees for access to health care and educat= ion.

"The objectives of the World Bank with this failed conference were simpl= y an image-washing operation," said a statement from a Barcelona-based camp= aign that had worked on planning for the demonstrations. Now, the World Ban= k is depicting itself as the injured party.

Protest organizers are derisive about the Bank's media spin: "The repres= entatives of the globalized capitalism feel threatened by the popular movem= ents against globalization. They, who meet in towers surrounded by walls an= d soldiers in order to stay apart from the people whom they oppress, wish t= o appear as victims. They, who have at their disposal the resources of the planet, complain that those who have nothing wanted to have their voice hea= rd."

The World Bank's gambit of seeking refuge in cyberspace should be a wake= -up call to activists who dream that Websites and email are paradigm-shatte= ring tools of the people. Some who take it for granted that "the revolution= will not be televised" seem to hope that their revolution will be digitize= d.

But there's nothing inherently democratizing about the Internet. In fact= , it has developed into a prodigious conduit of political and cultural prop= aganda, distributed via centrally edited mega-networks. America Online has 27 million subscribers, the New Internationalist magazine noted recently. "= They spend an incredible 84 percent of their Internet time on AOL alone, wh= ich provides a regulated leisure and shopping environment dominated by in-h= ouse brands -- from Time magazine to Madonna's latest album."

At the same time that creative advocates for social change are routinely= putting the Internet to great use, powerful elite bodies like the World Ba= nk are touting online innovations as democratic models -- while striving to= elude the reach of progressive grassroots activism.

If, in 1968, the Democratic National Convention had been held in cybersp= ace instead of in Chicago, on what streets would the antiwar protests have converged? If, on Inauguration Day this year, the swearing-in ceremony for George W. Bush had taken place virtually rather than at one end of Pennsylv= ania Avenue, where would people have gathered to hold up their signs saying= "Hail to the Thief"?

Top officials of the World Bank are onto something. In a managerial worl= d, disruption must be kept to an absolute minimum. If global corporatizatio= n is to achieve its transnational potential, the discourse among power brok= ers and their favorite thinkers can happen everywhere at once -- and nowher= e in particular. Let the troublemakers try to interfere by doing civil diso= bedience in cyberspace!

In any struggle that concentrates on a battlefield of high-tech communic= ations, the long-term advantages are heavily weighted toward institutions w= ith billions of dollars behind them. Whatever our hopes, no technology can make up for a lack of democracy.

Norman Solomon's latest book is "The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media." His syndicated column focuses on media and politics.

Copyright 2016 Joe Shea The American Reporter. All Rights Reserved.

Site Meter